They are the Future of Humanity

Monday, June 24, 2013

Philosophia Perennis

The sages aforetime acquired their knowledge from the Prophets, inasmuch as the latter were the Exponents of divine philosophy and the Revealers of heavenly mysteries.
(Tablets of Baha’u’llah: 144-145) 

Nowhere is the current transition now going on to a new, spiritual paradigm of knowledge more evident than in the field of cosmology, with developments especially prominent in physics and psychology after the Newtonian paradigm was overthrown by Einstein and the positivist psychology and epistemology of the late nineteenth century was broken by Freud.  And nowhere but in the field of cosmology can the historical link between the ancient and modern worlds, the divine impulse and the human response, be better seen.  But that is characteristic of perceiving the end and the beginning as one, if the end is the beginning transformed. 
Cosmology is the study of the nature of the universe.  There are basically three kinds of cosmology, because there are basically three levels to the cosmos, spiritual, mental or symbolic, and physical.  These are matched, roughly speaking, by the three structures of knowledge, religious, artistic, scientific.
A spiritual cosmology sees the entire cosmos as a sacred creation infused with sacred power, inclusive of the physical and mental cosmologies.  It is religiously-based and it explains the existence and nature of things within God’s creation as the effects of the working of laws and principles in a metaphysical dimension that surrounds and influences this physical universe.
A mental or symbolic cosmology would be a philosophical or poetic cosmology built on imaginative and intellectual understanding of all things. It would point to the mental or Mind foundation of the physical universe and give rational or imaginative knowledge of it. This cosmology is, historically, first a poetic and then a philosophical cosmology.  Poetic and literary cosmology presents an imaginative understanding of the cosmos.  One does not need to believe it, as one does religion, nor believe it to be empirically factual, i.e. corresponding in every important detail to physical reality, as one does science.  Rather it uses a framework of imagery to build an internally coherent picture. Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey are ancient examples, as is the Aeneid by Virgil.  Still later Milton’s Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, and Blake’s Jerusalem and Prophetic Books, performed something of the same function for the English-speaking world of the Elizabethan and then the Romantic Eras.  Eliot’s Four Quartets is a modern-day cosmology of this sort.
A physical cosmology explains just the physical universe. It is our current scientific cosmology.  It wishes to know the material laws and facts of how the universe is put together and works. 
The religious cosmologies are the first and most inclusive, incorporating more dimensions within their scope.  While the religious expands into or takes cultural form as, poetic and artistic symbols and other forms of knowledge, because the divine informs the rational from above, the scientific grows out from these same symbols into concepts and material facts.
Pondering the nature of the universe is an ancient art.  Poet and critic Paul Valery wrote:Cosmology is one of the oldest of literary arts.”   And the oldest of these in any philosophic sense is the Hermetic tradition.
The ancient Hermetic teachings were laid down by the eponymous figure of the Egyptian Hermes Trismegistus.  The name Trismegistus means “thrice-great” because he purportedly mastered the three kinds of knowledge—spiritual, mental, material.  He is also called Thoth, Idris, Hermes of Greek mythology, and Mercury.  Baha’u’llah writes of Hermes Trismegistus in the Tablet of Wisdom, calling Him "the Father of Philosophy."  In a footnote of that work it states: “In one of His Tablets Bahá'u'lláh wrote: 'The first person who devoted himself to philosophy was Idris. Thus was he named.  Some called him also Hermes. In every tongue he hath a special name. He it is who hath set forth in every branch of philosophy thorough and convincing statements. After him Balinus derived his knowledge and sciences from the Hermetic Tablets and most of the philosophers who followed him made their philosophical and scientific discoveries from his words and statements...' In the Qur'án, Sura 19, verses 57 and 58, is written: 'And commemorate Idris in the Book; for he was a man of truth, a Prophet; And we uplifted him to a place on high.” (Tablets of Baha’u’llah:147)
The essence of His teachings was set out in what is known as The Emerald Tablet—which is a symbol of Revelation, and which was actually chrysolite—also a greenish color stone. (See Tablets of Baha'u'llah:147)
Its most often misquoted principle is: As above, so below.  It is misquoted because the principle is actually: As Below, so Above.  These terms refer, metaphorically, to the above of the spirit and the below of matter, but the above here is also inner, and below is outer: mind and matter.
Through Hermes, or Idris, teachings the cosmos is knowable as a symbolic structure, an unfolding relation between two universal realities, the One Mind, which is the Universal Mind, and the One Thing, or primal, elemental Matter, the prima material, the basic substance of the universe.  These realities were considered to be interconnected and interrelated, making a same but different structure.  But it was Mind that in-forms, or puts form into, this matter, which was the repository of all past and future physical configurations.  That is, active Mind energized its recipient Matter, giving it life and form and purpose.
These principles of Hermes teachings were the foundation of alchemy and most other occult arts around the world.  That is, they are not just the origins of systematic thought but also of science.  They unfold into philosophy and logical thought, which is the conceptual, sparking the division into rational/irrational, that became focused in the transition in Greek thought from Homer to Plato.  Though the pre-Socratics may be given the nod for the start of systematic thought of a certain kind, it was Hermes who laid the foundations for all symbolic thought, and all knowledge is structures and codes of symbols.
By saying that Hermes teachings were the foundation for alchemy, the arts and the sciences, I don’t mean that everybody learned directly from Hermes, for spirit manifests where it wills and does not need cultural diffusion to create its effects.  Nonetheless, given the similarity of the different alchemical traditions, it seems that this is a level of collective human consciousness. In any search for archetypal metaphors of connection between the inner and outer, the spiritual and material, realms of existence and experience, this philosophy has generated a whole bunch of different images.  The great chain of being, planes of correspondence, the dance of life which is the vibrations of life along the hierarchy, are all primary cosmological Hermetic images organizing cosmological thought down to the Elizabethan Age. The Hermetic tradition was a powerful stream of thought into the early modern age when it was banished to the underground—because of the luxurious growth of imaginary accretions it had acquired by then.  Yet well known “modern” users include Newton and Hegel, scientists and philosophers by day, but alchemists and occultists by night.
It is, perhaps, this tradition of thought that Baha’u’llah means when he writes: “Although it is recognized that the contemporary men of learning are highly qualified in philosophy, arts and crafts, yet were anyone to observe with a discriminating eye he would readily comprehend that most of this knowledge hath been acquired from the sages of the past, for it is they who have laid the foundation of philosophy, reared its structure and reinforced its pillars.” (Tablets of Baha’u’llah:144-145)  And His Tablet of Wisdom (Hermetic literature is known as wisdom literature) repeats the essential Hermetic cosmological themes and images, calling the cosmos “the glorious structure” built on the Hermetic principle: “these two are the same, yet they are different.” (Tablets of Baha’u’llah:140)
The hermetic teachings remain, despite their antiquity, the best philosophical cosmology out there, perhaps because, as Baha’u’llah asserts, they were divinely inspired.  


Sunday, June 9, 2013

Complementarity: After the Image and Likeness

I want to make you understand that material progress and spiritual progress are two very different things, and that only if material progress goes hand in hand with spirituality can any real progress come about, and the Most Great Peace reign in the world
(Abdu'l-Baha, Paris Talks:107-108)


There are two sorts of complementary forms, those on the same plane of being and those on different planes of being: those that share a nature and those of different natures, yet, in this second case, one is made after the image and likeness of the other, so there is what is called structural symmetry. 
Same plane of being complements are a polarity of equality.  This is shown in such metaphors as the two wings of a bird, the woman and man complement that gives full expression to humanity, the polar structure of two manifesting one because they share the same nature.  This equality of manifesting the same nature enables the pair not to divide into a dichotomy, a contradiction or a division, but to be complements, unless one is wrongly thought to be superior to the other.  When this wrongheaded elevation of one pole over the other occurs we call it prejudice and discrimination.
But the structural correspondence, symmetry or homology between pairs on different levels of being is a harder idea to grasp.  For, ontologically, (i.e. as states of being) the first of the pair is superior to the second, yet they are connected by the principle “made in the image and likeness.”
Such complements are as the reality and its image in the mirror, or the Kingdoms of Revelation and Creation--and remember, creation is as a mirror (see, for example, The Secret of Divine Civilization p. 1).  But, though complements on different planes of being are not equals, "likeness" binds them together.  They are in relationship of ordinate and subordinate, and these can individually move in opposite directions which lead to different ends, as ‘Abdu’l-Baha states above about spiritual and material progress.  This can happen because the higher is autonomous while the lower is only semi-autonomous, like a federalist political structure,
Spiritually, the subordinate process is, by comparison, the empty form of reality, which means it is pure potential, as the mirror is pure potential for reflecting until an object is placed before it and its potential for reflection becomes actualized.  Hence, another way of saying structural correspondence is to say “a reflection of.”   Here is where it gets tricky.  In visual imagery, complementarity is the object and its mirror image appearing together, remembering that the image and likeness in the mirror is both a reverse polarity of the reality—left in the reality is right in the mirror—and is a likeness in reduced dimensions—three dimensional reality appearing as two dimensional reflection.  This same image in literature has an interesting meaning and effect.  Northrop Frye states: “Disappearing into one’s own mirror image, or entering into a world of reversed or reduced dimensions is a central symbol of descent.” (The Secular Scripture:108)    
Now if there is to be communication and development, a transformational logic must hold between complements on different levels of being.  All complements need to be mediated.  Complements on the same plane exist within a shared medium, as men and women share a common humanity.  Complements on different planes communicate through a shared medium that is on a level different from both, as the world of the Manifestation exists between that of God and humanity.  He is the mediator, and after Him His Message mediates.  But the mediator is also the source of advance for the lower and smaller reality, for the mediator brings new energy and new pattern from the higher reality to the lower one.
Thus the lower reality comes out of a higher one: i.e. is made after it in the order of creation.  The reality of the lower is the image and likeness of the higher, but not of the same nature.  But being made in the image and likeness of the higher, means, too, that a part of the higher exists in the lower—this higher aspect being its true reality or essence—and this higher aspect is the cause of the development of the lower: its heart and mid-most point out from which pours energy and unfolding pattern.  This principle is behind the oft quoted nugget: “Man is in the world, but not of it.”
The Biblical statement in the Book of Genesis is that man was created “in the image and after the likeness” (Genesis 1:26) of God, but not after His nature.  The image and likeness of God is His Manifestation, so humans are created after the Manifestation—again in His image and likeness but not in His nature.  The same relation holds between man and the rest of creation.  I mean that creation is made in the image and likeness of the human reality.  ‘Abdu’l-Baha explains: “God has created man after His own image and likeness. He has endowed him with a mighty power which is capable of discovering the mysteries of phenomena...This is the foundation of the world of humanity; this is the image and likeness of God; this is the reality of man; otherwise, he is an animal. Verily, God has created the animal in the image and likeness of man, for though man outwardly is human, yet in nature he possesses animal tendencies.” (The Promulgation of Universal Peace:262)  Even more generally: “As preordained by the Fountainhead of Creation, the temple of the world hath been fashioned after the image and likeness of the human body. In fact each mirroreth forth the image of the other, wert thou but to observe with discerning eyes. By this is meant that even as the human body in this world which is outwardly composed of different limbs and organs, is in reality a closely integrated, coherent entity, similarly the structure of the physical world is like unto a single being whose limbs and members are inseparably linked together.” (Compilations, Huququ'llah #61)
The soul and the body are also connected, but they are of different natures, so the higher one, the soul, cannot be fully in the other, the body.  But their union is reflected in language.  When we look at our own photograph we say: “That’s me!”  But of course it is only a reflection of our body.  In language this kind of union of natures is called a Hendiadys.  Hendiadys is a figure of speech: a linguistic structure used for emphasis by a substitution of a conjunction for a subordination.  English names for hendiadys include “two for one”.  Its reverse, "one through two", is also true.   For example: “The hot wind moved across the desert” changes into the hendiadys: “The heat and the wind moved across the desert.”  The basic idea is to use two words linked by a conjunction to express a single complex idea. The second term is as the adjective of the first, but in their linguistic union it is lifted into co-equality as noun, so that the whole complex idea may be visible. 
But, because the two natures of humanity are essentially different and have their own goals, then, via the metaphor of reversal, the complementary union of the soul and the body can change into a contradiction, and the natures can move in morally opposite directions.  The Master explains that every individual “has the animal side as well as the angelic side, and the aim of an educator is to so train human souls that their angelic aspect may overcome their animal side. Then if the divine power in man, which is his essential perfection, overcomes the satanic power, which is absolute imperfection, he becomes the most excellent among the creatures; but if the satanic power overcomes the divine power, he becomes the lowest of the creatures. That is why he is the end of imperfection and the beginning of perfection. Not in any other of the species in the world of existence is there such a difference, contrast, contradiction and opposition as in the species of man.” (Some Answered Questions: 235)
The relations of complementary forms have various states and expressions.  They form a polarity of equals if they share the same nature, as men and women do of a common humanity.  They have the relation of image to reality, as in the mirror image reflecting the reality placed before it.  But the image and the reality while forming a polarity do so by reversing the poles, left in the object is right in the mirror.  This reversal when reflected in the complements of unequals is a metaphor for the moral opposition of material and spiritual that is felt within the human being, who is nonetheless made in the image and after the likeness of the Manifestation but not after His nature, though sharing His qualities. His being and Message are the source of human development.  Similarly, the animal is made in the image of the human being, but lacking the power of rational thought is different in nature from the human being, though sharing with man all the sensory perfections. Humans are the source of nature's development--e.g. from wilderness to garden.  Finally, the physical world in its totality is made in the image and likeness of the human body.  More in the next post.

A direct link to my book, Renewing the Sacred, is http://tinyurl.com/cndew5a.  It is now also in Kindle.