Moreover, entrance and exit, descent
and ascent, are characteristics of bodies and not of spirits—that is to say,
sensible realities enter and come forth, but intellectual subtleties and mental
realities, such as intelligence, love, knowledge, imagination and thought, do
not enter, nor come forth, nor descend, but rather they have direct
connection. For example, knowledge, which is a state attained to by the
intelligence, is an intellectual condition; and entering and coming out of the
mind are imaginary conditions; but the mind is connected with the acquisition
of knowledge, like images reflected in a mirror.
(Some Answered Questions, p. 106)
It is
often believed that knowledge is something that human beings generate and acquire,
because that is how we frame it. When we speak of “acquiring” knowledge we are
saying knowledge is like some sort of material commodity that the mind can
accumulate, a position reflecting a now common commercial way of looking at
things where human beings start out poor and empty and must be filled and
enriched. “Acquiring” is an acceptable way to view gains in knowledge, of
course, but acquiring has to do with learning, with moving from a condition of
ignorance to one of knowing, not with knowledge itself. Both Baha’u’llah and ‘Abdu’l-Baha speak of
“acquiring” the sciences, the arts and knowledge. But Baha’u’llah countered the poor and empty
view by asking: “I created thee rich, why dost thou bring thyself down to
poverty?” (Arabic Hidden Words #13)
Maybe we
need a new set of images and metaphors to understand what knowledge is and how
it is attained, and not just figuratively describe how it is gotten or
obtained—again physical words to describe something material and sensible. For, according to ‘Abdu’l-Baha’s quote above,
neither knowledge nor the intelligence is a sensible reality. Knowledge has no material properties. It cannot enter, nor come forth, nor
descend. It has a direct connection with the mind—an
image which we will explore. It is a
state attained to by the intelligence, is an intellectual condition.
The phrase “acquiring knowledge”, then, really describes
the holding and accessing of larger “volumes” of learning, which is a function
of memory. But attaining to any state of
knowledge comes from improving the innate faculties of perception and reception
and bettering the intellectual instruments of science and art, so that deeper
penetration into the realms of knowledge results, so that greater insight
occurs—perceiving behind the coverings of the world—and insight leads to knowledge.
One purpose of knowledge is to generate more knowledge through its application
to novel situations. The foundation of
new knowledge is insight. Leaps into new states are not logically connected
with what came before, but are something higher or greater, i.e. of another
order. The difference is not
quantitative, but qualitative. Attaining
a qualitatively new understanding of reality is to attain a new state of
knowledge, and once in that new state the mind and heart may acquire, by effort
and striving, greater knowledge of that state.
I frame the discussion this way because, if
knowledge is a state attained to by the intelligence, then both knowledge and
the inner potential state of intelligence that goes with that state of
knowledge already exist. Attaining the
state of knowledge is to bring knowledge and intelligence together in a conscious
union of some kind. It is another example of the “B” and the “E” being joined
and knit together. The appearance of new knowledge in the mind is the proof
that the intelligence has attained that state of knowledge.
Knowledge
does not move, neither does the inner state, but some change occurs in
intelligence, as wave pulses of energy move across the ocean. It is, to employ the final image in our
opening quote, like the sun appearing in a mirror. ‘Abdu’l-Baha says in another place: “…the
rational soul, meaning the human spirit, does not descend into the body—that is
to say, it does not enter it, for descent and entrance are characteristics of
bodies, and the rational soul is exempt from this. The spirit never entered
this body, so in quitting it, it will not be in need of an abiding-place: no,
the spirit is connected with the body, as this light is with this mirror. When
the mirror is clear and perfect, the light of the lamp will be apparent in it,
and when the mirror becomes covered with dust or breaks, the light will
disappear.” (Some Answered Questions: 239)
I said that one purpose of knowledge is to discover
more knowledge. New knowledge is generated in this way. But if all knowledge
already exists, what is being generated?
We will take this question up in the next post.
The ultimate purpose of knowledge is to understand truth.
Knowledge is not
necessarily truth. We can be in state of
knowledge but not be in the truth of it.
One can say, for example, that 2+2=5.
While this is a mistake of calculation, it is not a mistake of logical
reasoning with numbers. There is knowledge
of that state, but not truth of it. On
more profound questions this is where metaphors of becoming free from the dust of misconceptions and the
clay of illusions so one can perceive clearly come in.
We are trying to grasp spiritual realities here and
the spiritual dynamics of life and existence are different from material
realities of movement, place, and time. While
the intelligence moves in understanding from the concrete to the abstract, the
abstract in itself has, nevertheless, a different kind of reality. The concrete is as a scaffolding. At some point the scaffolding can be kicked
away.
The understanding of the spiritual
dynamic is, to me, the uncovering with greater clarity and understanding of pre-existent relations and essential,
universal connections between the material and spiritual. The pre-existent
relation is known by “direct connection” and the movement toward understanding
is removing the veils that are interposed in that relation that make realities
seem more loosely connected than they really are. About the connection between spiritual and
material realities, the Master explains: “The mind which is in man, the
existence of which is recognized—where is it in him? If you examine the body
with the eye, the ear or the other senses, you will not find it; nevertheless,
it exists. Therefore, the mind has no place, but it is connected with the
brain. The Kingdom is also like this. In the same way love has no place, but it
is connected with the heart; so the Kingdom has no place, but is connected with
man. (Some Answered Questions: 242)
We know
that ‘Abdu’l-Baha speaks of the human intelligence "attaining" a
state, not a quantity, of knowledge, and that this state or states are attained
by understanding the direct connection between the condition of intelligence
that connects with that state of knowledge.
What are the parameters of states of knowledge? Baha’u’llah, quoting an Islamic tradition,
wrote: "Knowledge is all that is knowable.” (Kitab-i-Iqan:185) From the human side, all that is knowable
depends upon how wide one draws the circle of real knowledge. I mean that there are different states of
knowledge—sensory, intellectual and spiritual—and different means one goes
about attaining them—senses, intellectual faculties, spiritual faculties. Within each state of knowing the knowledge
manifested is of that state. One “acquires” that knowledge because one is
in that state, has attained unto it. The knowledge is a manifestation of
that state; is the state itself. Higher states are unknowable to one in a
lower state and thus its knowledge is not knowable to him.
Higher levels of spiritual knowledge are due to an
increased fidelity of the mirror of the heart, much like, I suppose, the kind
of increased power of vision that comes to astronomers when the mirror of their
telescope is larger and better polished.
Here, however, we are not looking outwardly into stellar space but
inwardly into what ‘Abdu’l-Baha called the “supernal sky.” (Selections from
the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha: 259)
There are two ways to acquire capacity for
knowledge. These two ways are effort and
attraction. But we must also combine
these ways and say we exert the best effort when we are most attracted. The
question then becomes: toward what domain of knowledge are we most attracted? That is the next post.