(T)here is a
spiritual dimension to formal causality, as there is to all acts of creation.
(Marshall McLuhan and Eric McLuhan, Media and Formal Cause: ix)
I am trying to discover for myself what a spiritual causality is and
how it works, using statements from the Bahá’í Writings and the four causes of
Aristotle.
The next step is to distinguish the four causes
from each other, for there is much confusion about them. As the giver of definition,
formal causality is often called something like the image of the thing to be
created conceived by the maker, inventor or artist. Thus, it is like a blueprint showing how the
final cause, the purpose of the thing, can be realized through the efficient
cause working upon the material cause. But it is a mistake to identify the blueprint with the
formal cause, just because it seems to be what the builder works from. The blueprint itself causes nothing. It is rather the final picture of what is to
be the result of many prior causes and actions.
Hence the blueprint idea is actually much closer to the final cause,
what pulls the efficient work toward it.
The
final or manifest form in organic being is the end form of that formative
process, which is also the fully manifest or mature form of the essential form in matter. The interaction and union between the formal
and final forms, the first or formative and final or teleological causes,
provides, also, a regulative function.
That is, the goal of any work helps
decide what to do next, what parts to keep and which to have come to an end, as
they move the whole of evolution towards its destined end. Formal cause is the imprinted pattern to be realized. It is the beginning of what will become a
chain of events to the present. Final
cause suggests the future influencing the present in the sense that it is what
a thing is to become that helps determine its present stage of development. It is the organic constraints upon the
spirit.
Because
all other causes and forms are within the formal cause, there is, too, a
reciprocal relation between the formal cause and the efficient cause, for the
efficient cause must takes its direction and authority from the formal cause in
order to realize the final cause, and the formal cause must modify and react to
the work of the efficient causal agents in their own creativity. The efficient cause is the work of all
humanity responding to the “imperatives” of the morphogenetic form. The material cause is the established organic
forms of social and intellectual existence which must undergo transformation to
be aligned with the new morphogenetic or archetypal form. Now this process goes on at many levels
simultaneously, it is a nested hierarchy of fields of development, all
proceeding from the original, essential form and all finding coordinated
expression in the final form. In a
nested hierarchy, a ground is both ground for other things and is itself but a
figure in a larger ground.
Yet, and it is a BIG
yet, as container or ground of all other causes, formal cause is not a part of
the order of development. I said it was the beginning, true, but remember Baha'u'llah speaks of creation as having existed "from the beginning that hath no beginning, apart from its being preceded
by a Firstness which cannot be regarded as firstness." (Tablets of Baha'u'llah: 140) That is, formal cause does not begin any temporal sequence, for that is the realm of efficient
cause moving toward the final cause. Formal cause is spiritual. The whole order of development is the realization in organic, temporal form of
the formal cause. One author put
it thus: “The ultimate completion and perfection are accordingly not something
to be worked out by a cause. Rather, it
is something that is there in its finished and complete perfection before there
can be any question of a cause going to work….These effects preexist and are
pre-contained long before the causes that produce them go into operation.”
(Owens quoted in Media and Formal Cause:60) The effects are possibilities within the
formal cause itself.
I mean that formal cause does not create results by knocking against anything, by being
the first in a sequence of actions upon something other than itself. Billiard ball metaphors do not capture how it
influences creation. That is efficient causality. It does so, rather, by Being itself flowing through
Its quality of creator and leaving an imprint of light, or code of information,
upon creation. It is a “vibrating
influence” as in: “All that is known owes its renown to the splendour of Thy
Name, the Most Manifest, and every object is deeply stirred by the vibrating
influence emanating from Thine invincible Will.” (Selections from the Writings of the Bab:195) Traditionally, form actualizes potential, making or forming something into the kind or type of thing that it
is. But existing forms must be trans-formed
by further actualizing of their potentials.
Though,
as Baha’u’llah says, everything must have a cause and a builder, He is not
speaking of an efficient cause, a cause within time and temporality. This may be difficult to grasp, because it
goes against what is generally considered to be how cause and effect works,
which is what material science is based upon.
Material science seeks to establish a strictly physical sequence of
causation for all phenomena, which being in time and organic flow this
causation can only be linear, sequentially efficient causality, like
the mechanized assembly-line that builds our cars. Efficient causality works
on the premise of A before B, where A is both necessary and possibly sufficient
to cause B within time.
Logos
or the Word as cosmological formal cause is simply BE. It starts from the assumption that an
energetic, patterned and influential spiritual world precedes, not sequentially
but formally, the material, quantitative world of effects. Spirit is the plane of causation modulating
into matter, the Word made flesh. It
is the first principles and laws of spiritual genesis flowing into laws of
material generation of the new which is also renewal. Spiritual causation
is not linear and sequential, but formal and simultaneous; “Be and it is”. Like
the image appearing in the mirror, the whole reality appears simultaneously and
imprints its image upon the mirror. Spirit
is a resonant structure with a vibrating influence. It is not like painting where the painter
laboriously transfers the image in his mind to canvas.
A closer analogy to spiritual cause is the imaginative
causality characteristic of myth. In
myth the formative principle is “let this be”, the “And God said” of the Bible.
This is similar to the kind of non-local everything is in everything causality
science is now exploring in Quantum Mechanics (sometimes called “the science of
possibility”), Chaos Theory, and Complexity science. It is a fluid metamorphosis
of one thing into another, as in a dream, or the everywhere–at-once power of a
field to bring forth novelty.
Again,
when considered closely, this first form, the Formal Cause, is the animating
power animating the final cause and all other causes, for the active force and
that which is its recipient are the same yet they are different. This is the Glorious Structure of the soul’s mysterious
relationship with the body at every level of being and every stage of growth. That is, it is the relationship of the formal
cause, (the innate character or imprint that is soul), with the final cause, (the
inherited physical character), through the efficient cause, (the character acquired
through education, knowledge and learning), to act upon and transform the physical
and intellectual material of creation.
A direct link to my book, Renewing the Sacred is http://tinyurl.com/cndew5a It is now also in Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment