Ye who are
servants of the human race, strive ye with all your heart to deliver mankind
out of this darkness and these prejudices that belong to the human condition
and the world of nature, so that humanity may find its way into the light of
the world of God. Praise be to Him, ye are acquainted with the various laws,
institutions and principles of the world; today nothing short of these divine
teachings can assure peace and tranquillity to mankind. But for these
teachings, this darkness shall never vanish, these chronic diseases shall never
be healed; nay, they shall grow fiercer from day to day. Strive ye, therefore,
with the help of God, with illumined minds and hearts and a strength born of
heaven, to become a bestowal from God to man, and to call into being for all
humankind, comfort and peace.
(Selections from the Writings of Abdu'l-Baha:
249)
This
post is the first in a series of posts that will examine the spiritual pre-requisites
and dimensions of peace.
In
a world increasingly dominated by fear, distrust and despair, rocked daily by acts
of terror, social upheavals, and civil disorder, and the looming threat of catastrophic
war, peace surges as the one dream of all.
But how to get there?
I
will examine this question by taking an in-depth look at a penetrating thematic
statement from the House of Justice about how peace is actually brought about
through a close
interplay between emerging inner powers of the soul and outer supporting social
forces.
To glance ahead, I will argue that all
efforts of peace will fail until the bringing forth, the educing, of spiritual
powers is accomplished. Failure to tap
our spiritual endowments prevents peace from coming about, despite humanity’s
best intentions and most disinterested efforts.
In short, peace can’t come about except through manifesting a certain
condition of the soul. This, in turn, is
accomplished by arousing and training certain faculties of the soul which drive
and guide collective social action, laying the foundation of just laws and the
diffusing of ethical mores in harmony with human higher nature, and, finally, to
the erection of supporting social institutions and educational practices.
The
first part of the House of Justice statement is: “(T)he abolition of war is not
simply a matter of signing treaties and protocols; it is a complex task
requiring a new level of commitment to resolving issues not customarily
associated with the pursuit of peace. Based on political agreements alone, the
idea of collective security is a chimera. The other point is that the primary
challenge in dealing with issues of peace is to raise the context to the level
of principle, as distinct from pure pragmatism. For, in essence, peace stems
from an inner state supported by a spiritual or moral attitude, and it is
chiefly in evoking this attitude that the possibility of enduring solutions can
be found.” (The Universal House of Justice, The
Promise of World Peace: para. 36)
What
is that “inner state” from which stems peace?
I believe that it is the state of unity. This inner state is founded
upon the proper use of a religious faculty or instinct, for the religion of God
in the Bahá’i Writings, is the most great and powerful example of unity. The
spiritual or moral attitude referenced by the House of Justice may be
justice. It, too, is funded upon an
inner faculty of justice. But let’s back
up a moment.
Baha’u’llah
Himself states the prerequisite of world peace.
He says: “The well-being of mankind, its peace and security, are
unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established. This unity can
never be achieved so long as the counsels which the Pen of the Most High hath
revealed are suffered to pass unheeded.” (Gleanings
from the Writings of Baha'u'llah: 286)
So a condition of global social unity precedes world peace, and such
unity cannot be achieved so long as humanity disregards or turns a deaf ear to
the means to achieve that ultimate state that are within the Bahá’i Writings.
Now
a condition of unity in the outer human world can be achieved because unity is
already existent in the inner world of the spirit: “Unity is a condition of the
human spirit. Education can support and
enhance it, as can legislation, but they can do so only once it emerges and has
established itself as a compelling force in social life.” (One Common Faith: 42) However this soul condition of unity cannot
emerge as a compelling force in social life until a reign of social justice is
established. Baha’u’llah states that: “The purpose of justice is the
appearance of unity among men. The ocean of divine wisdom surgeth within this
exalted word, while the books of the world cannot contain its inner
significance.” (Tablets of Baha'u'llah: 66-67)
Unity
emerges as a compelling force in the form of and a as result of the power of
justice, because the purpose of justice is the appearance of unity. The power of justice is built upon reward and
punishment. Religion is the greatest
manifestation of this condition of unity, indeed unity is built upon a
conception of true religion. That
conception was explicitly by Baha’u’llah when He asserted: “This is the
changeless Faith of God, eternal in the past, eternal in the future. Let him
that seeketh, attain it…” (Gleanings from
the Writings of Baha'u'llah: 136)
Now,
the House indicates that ‘the primary challenge in dealing with issues of peace
is to raise the context to the level of principle, as distinct from pure
pragmatism.” The first and cardinal
principle is the principle of the oneness of humankind. Shoghi Effendi writes: “The principle of the
Oneness of Mankind—the pivot round which all the teachings of Bahá'u'lláh
revolve—is no mere outburst of ignorant emotionalism or an expression of vague
and pious hope. Its appeal is not to be merely identified with a reawakening of
the spirit of brotherhood and good-will among men, nor does it aim solely at
the fostering of harmonious cooperation among individual peoples and nations.
Its implications are deeper, its claims greater than any which the Prophets of
old were allowed to advance. Its message is applicable not only to the
individual, but concerns itself primarily with the nature of those essential
relationships that must bind all the states and nations as members of one human
family. It does not constitute merely the enunciation of an ideal, but stands
inseparably associated with an institution adequate to embody its truth,
demonstrate its validity, and perpetuate its influence. It implies an organic
change in the structure of present-day society, a change such as the world has
not yet experienced. It constitutes a challenge, at once bold and universal, to
outworn shibboleths of national creeds—creeds that have had their day and which
must, in the ordinary course of events as shaped and controlled by Providence,
give way to a new gospel, fundamentally different from, and infinitely superior
to, what the world has already conceived. It calls for no less than the
reconstruction and the demilitarization of the whole civilized world—a world
organically unified in all the essential aspects of its life, its political
machinery, its spiritual aspiration, its trade and finance, its script and
language, and yet infinite in the diversity of the national characteristics of
its federated units.
It
represents the consummation of human evolution—an evolution that has had its
earliest beginnings in the birth of family life, its subsequent development in
the achievement of tribal solidarity, leading in turn to the constitution of
the city-state, and expanding later into the institution of independent and
sovereign nations.
The
principle of the Oneness of Mankind, as proclaimed by Bahá'u'lláh, carries with
it no more and no less than a solemn assertion that attainment to this final
stage in this stupendous evolution is not only necessary but inevitable, that
its realization is fast approaching, and that nothing short of a power that is
born of God can succeed in establishing it.” (The World Order of Baha'u'llah:42-43)
No comments:
Post a Comment